Replies

Abstract
I reply to challenges raised by contributors to this book symposium. Key challenges include (but are not limited to): distancing my new account of reductionism-in-practice from my previous “new wave” account; clarifying my claimed “heuristic” status for higher-level investigations (including cognitive-neuroscientific ones); defending the “reorientation of philosophical desires” I claim to be required by my project; and addressing consideration about normativity
Keywords Neuroscience  Normativity  Reductionism  Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11097-005-4074-2
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,349
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Unity of Science.Rudolf Carnap - 1934 - London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co..
On Reduction.John G. Kemeny & Paul Oppenheim - 1956 - Philosophical Studies 7 (1-2):6 - 19.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
50 ( #107,616 of 2,193,746 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #145,875 of 2,193,746 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature