Lessons from the vioxx debacle: What the privatization of science can teach us about social epistemology

Social Epistemology 21 (1):21 – 39 (2007)
Since the early 1980s, private, for-profit corporations have become increasingly involved in all aspects of scientific research, especially of biomedical research. In this essay, I argue that there are dangerous epistemic consequences of this trend, which should be more thoroughly examined by social epistemologists. In support of this claim, I discuss a recent episode of pharmaceutical research involving the painkiller Vioxx. I argue that the research on Vioxx was epistemically problematic and that the primary cause of these inadequacies was faulty institutional arrangements. More specifically, the research was organized in such a way as to allow short-term commercial interests to compromise epistemic integrity. Thus, the Vioxx case study, in conjunction with numerous case studies developed elsewhere, provides strong reasons for believing that the privatization of the biomedical sciences is epistemically worrisome, and it suggests that the primary response to this situation should be a social, or organizational, one. What kind of organizational response would be most beneficial? I briefly discuss two prominent social epistemological proposals for how scientific research should be organized - namely those of Philip Kitcher and Helen Longino - and I suggest that they are incapable of dealing with the phenomenon of privatization. I then draw upon the Vioxx episode in order to outline an alternative suggestion for reorganizing certain aspects of pharmaceutical research.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02691720601125472
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,613
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Fate of Knowledge.Helen Longino - 2002 - Princeton University Press.
Social Empiricism.Miriam Solomon - 1994 - Noûs 28 (3):325-343.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
State of the Field: Transient Underdetermination and Values in Science.Justin Biddle - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):124-133.
Bias and Values in Scientific Research.Torsten Wilholt - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40 (1):92-101.
A New Direction for Science and Values.Dan Hicks - 2014 - Synthese 191 (14):3271-95.
The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research.Jan De Winter & Laszlo Kosolosky - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):757-774.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

59 ( #88,814 of 2,168,944 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #346,364 of 2,168,944 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums