Learner, student, speaker: Why it matters how we call those we teach

Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (5):540-552 (2010)
Abstract
In this paper I discuss three different ways in which we can refer to those we teach: as learner, as student or as speaker. My interest is not in any aspect of teaching but in the question whether there can be such a thing as emancipatory education. Working with ideas from Jacques Rancière I offer the suggestion that emancipatory education can be characterised as education which starts from the assumption that all students can speak. It starts from the assumption, in other words, that students neither lack a capacity for speech, nor that they are producing noise. The idea of the student as a speaker is not offered as an empirical fact but as a different starting point for emancipatory education, one that positions equality at the beginning of education, not at its end.
Keywords speaker  Rancière  learner  democracy  students  politics  emancipation  democratic education
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00684.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,692
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Philosopher and His Poor.Jacques Rancière - 2004 - Duke University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-07-07

Total downloads

73 ( #70,923 of 2,158,467 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #132,916 of 2,158,467 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums