The Conflation of Competence and Capacity in English Medical Law: A Philosophical Critique [Book Review]

Abstract
Ethical and legal discourse pertaining to the ability to consent to treatment and research in England operates within a dualist framework of “competence” and “capacity”. This is confusing, as while there exists in England two possible senses of legal capacity – “first person” legal capacity and “delegable” legal capacity, currently neither is formulated to bear a necessary relationship with decision-making competence. Notwithstanding this, judges and academic commentators frequently invoke competence to consent in discussions involving the validity of offering or withholding consent as a synonym for legal capacity to consent. I argue that this gives rise to a conflation, jeopardising clarity and consistency in law. This is somewhat less problematic in instances of “first-person” legal capacity that are heavily informed by criteria for decision-making competence than in the second sense of legal capacity, which is qualitatively different from decision-making competence, or with first-person legal capacity when defined in different terms from competence. The paper concludes by proposing that the soundest resolution to this problem is by making decision-making competence a necessary and sufficient condition of first-person legal capacity, affording a more scrupulous distinction between the two different forms of legal capacity that exist
Keywords consent  decision-making competence  delegable legal capacity  English law  first-person legal capacity  legal capacity  mental capacity  task specific competence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-005-0537-z
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,587
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Reason and Morality.Adina Schwartz & Alan Gewirth - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (4):654.
Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Allan E. Buchanan & Dan W. Brock - 1992 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (1):232-237.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Mental Capacity and the Applied Phenomenology of Judgement.Wayne Martin & Ryan Hickerson - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (1):195-214.
Running Before We Can Walk: Do We Have the Capacity?Toby Williamson - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):147-150.
Faulty Judgment, Expert Opinion, and Decision-Making Capacity.Michel Silberfeld & David Checkland - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (4):377-393.
On Risk and Decisional Capacity.David Checkland - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (1):35 – 59.
Mental Competence or Best Interests?Ajit Shah - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):151-152.
Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total downloads
20 ( #285,148 of 2,235,720 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #82,385 of 2,235,720 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature