Zygon 47 (3):501-519 (2012)

Abstract Despite various criticisms, Ian Barbour's fourfold classification of the possible relationships between religion and science remains influential. I compare Barbour's taxonomy with the theories of four authors who, in the last four decades, have addressed the relationship between science and religion from a Muslim perspective. The aim of my analysis is twofold. First, I offer a comparative perspective to the debate on science and Islam. Second, following Barbour's suggestion, I test the general applicability of his categories by comparing them with a discourse on science and religion that is not focused on Christianity. In the first section, I reconstruct Barbour's typologies, recalling some major objections to them, and arguing why despite the latter, Barbour's model is employed for the present analysis. I also reconstruct Barbour's parallel model for the relationships between different religions. In the second section, I reconstruct the discourse on science and religion developed by the Palestinian-American scholar Ismail Raji al-Faruqi. The third section is devoted to the ideas of the Persian-American scholar Seyyed Hossein Nasr. In the fourth section, I examine the views of the Iranian author Mehdi Golshani. The fifth section reconstructs the theories of the Algerian author Nidhal Guessoum. In the final section, I argue that a generalized use of the “integration” concept to refer to the entire debate on Islam and science is unhelpful. While these positions do not appear to instantiate Barbourian integration of science and religion, they do move toward what Barbour (skeptically) describes as integration between religions
Keywords Seyyed Hossein Nasr
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01269.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,437
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life.David L. Hull - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):435-438.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Science, Religious Language, and Analogy.Andrew P. Porter - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (1):113-120.
Science and Religion: A Search for Synergism.Jared Michael Jones - 2005 - Dissertation, Texas A&M University
Religion & the Order of Nature.Seyyed Hossein Nasr - 1996 - Oxford University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
124 ( #80,523 of 2,421,199 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,757 of 2,421,199 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes