Abstract
Over the last 40 years or so, there has been an explosion of cultural evolution research in anthropology and archaeology. In each discipline, cultural evolutionists investigate how interactions between individuals translate into group level patterns, with the aim of explaining the diachronic dynamics and diversity of cultural traits. However, while much attention has been given to deterministic processes, we contend that current evolutionary accounts of cultural change are limited because they do not adopt a systematic stochastic approach. First, we show that, in contrast with the intense debates in ecology and population genetics, the importance of stochasticity in evolutionary processes has generated little discussion in the sciences of cultural evolution to date. Second, we speculate on the reasons, both ideological and methodological, why that should be so. Third, we highlight the inadequacy of genetically-inspired stochastic models in the context of cultural evolution modelling, and ask which fundamental stochastic processes might be more relevant to take up. We conclude that the field of cultural evolution would benefit from a stochastic revolution. For that to occur, stochastic models ought to be developed specifically for cultural data and not through a copy-pasting of neutral models from population genetics or ecology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s40656-017-0173-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,599
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Taming of Chance.Ian Hacking - 1990 - Cambridge University Press.
Interpretations of Probability.Alan Hájek - 2007 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Generalized Theory of Evolution, January 31–February 3, 2018, Dusseldorf.Francesco Suman - 2018 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 49 (1):137-140.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Open Letter to Comrade Lin Biao.[author unknown] - 2001 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 33:27-29.
Memes Revisited.Kim Sterelny - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):145-165.
Cultural Evolution is Not Equivalent to Darwinian Evolution.Dwight W. Read - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):361-361.
Cultural Evolution and the Variable Phenotype.William Harms - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (3):357-375.
The Uses of Ethnography in the Science of Cultural Evolution.Jamshid Tehrani - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):363-364.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-11-28

Total views
30 ( #369,912 of 2,462,104 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,940 of 2,462,104 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes