American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):3-12 (2014)
AbstractTo protect children in research, procedures that are not administered in the medical interests of a child must be restricted. The risk threshold for these procedures is generally measured according to the concept of minimal risk. Minimal risk is often defined according to the risks of “daily life.” But it is not clear whose daily life should serve as the baseline; that is, it is not clear to whom minimal risk should refer. Commentators in research ethics often argue that “minimal risk” should refer to healthy children or the subjects of the research. I argue that neither of these interpretations is successful. I propose a new interpretation in which minimal risk refers to children who are not unduly burdened by their daily lives. I argue that children are not unduly burdened when they fare well, and I defend a substantive goods account of children’s welfare.
Similar books and articles
Why the Debate Over Minimal Risk Needs to Be Reconsidered.Ariella Binik & Charles Weijer - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (4):387-405.
Minimal Risk as an International Ethical Standard in Research.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (3):351 – 378.
On the Minimal Risk Threshold in Research With Children: “Substantive Goods” and Other Criteria.Carlo Petrini - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):23-24.
Risk in Emergency Research Using a Waiver of/Exception From Consent: Implications of a Structured Approach for Institutional Review Board Review.Andrew D. McRae, Stacy Ackroyd-Stolarz & Charles Weijer - unknown
In Loco Parentis Minimal Risk as an Ethical Threshold for Research Upon Children.Benjamin Freedman, Abraham Fuks & Charles Weijer - 1993 - Hastings Center Report 23 (2):13-19.
Minimal Risk in Research Involving Pregnant Women and Fetuses.Carson Strong - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):529-538.
Forschung an Minderjährigen Im Internationalen Vergleich: Bilanz Und Zukunftsperspektiven. [REVIEW]Matthias Dahl & Claudia Wiesemann - 2001 - Ethik in der Medizin 13 (1-2):87-110.
Harms and Deprivation of Benefits for Nonhuman Primates in Research.Hope Ferdowsian & Agustín Fuentes - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (2):143-156.
Improving the Helsinki Declaration's Guidance on Research in Incompetent Subjects.Anna Eva Westra & Inez de Beaufort - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (3):278-280.
Convening a 407 Panel for Research Not Otherwise Approvable: "Precursors to Diabetes in Japanese American Youth" as a Case Study.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):165-186.
Research with Radiation and Healthy Children: Greater Than Minimal Risk.William L. Freeman - 1994 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 16 (5):1.
Does Radiation Research in Healthy Children Pose Greater Than Minimal Risk?Bonnie L. Specker & Eugene L. Saenger - 1994 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 16 (5):5.
Risk Standards for Pediatric Research: Rethinking The.David Wendler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):187-198.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Zone of Parental Discretion: An Ethical Tool for Dealing with Disagreement Between Parents and Doctors About Medical Treatment for a Child.Lynn Gillam - 2016 - Clinical Ethics 11 (1):1-8.
Indeterminacy and the Normative Basis of the Harm Threshold for Overriding Parental Decisions: A Response to Birchley.Rosalind J. McDougall - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):119-120.
Minority Report: Can Minor Parents Refuse Treatment for Their Child?Helen Lynne Turnham, Ariella Binik & Dominic Wilkinson - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (6):355-359.
Setting Risk Thresholds in Biomedical Research: Lessons From the Debate About Minimal Risk.Annette Rid - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (1-2):63-85.
Animal Research That Respects Animal Rights: Extending Requirements for Research with Humans to Animals.Angela K. Martin - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (1):59-72.
References found in this work
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach.Martha C. Nussbaum - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.