Science, Technology and Human Values 19 (2):189-204 (1994)
AbstractThis article considers how scientists involved in animal experimentation attempt to defend their practices. Interviews with over 40 scientists revealed that, over and above direct criticisms of the antivivisection lobby, scientists used a number of discursive strategies to demonstrate that critics of animal experimentation are ethically and epistemologically infenor to British scientific practitioners. The scientists portrayed a series of negative "others" such as foreign scientists, farmers, and pet owners. In this manner, they attempted to create a "socioethical domain" which rhetorically insulated them from criticism while simultaneously problematizing the critiques of the anti- animal-experimentation public. Some of the implications for relations between science and the public, especially regarding scientific credibility, are discussed.
Similar books and articles
Us and Them : Scientists' and Animal Rights Campaigners' Views of the Animal Experimentation Debate.Elizabeth S. Paul - 1995 - Society and Animals 3 (1):1-21.
Using language to find if Australian Animal Ethics Committees use emotion or ethics to assess animal experiments.Mikaela Ciprian, Laura D'Olimpio, Ram Pandit & Dominique Blache - unknown
Institutionalized Ethical Assessments of Animal Experiments.B. Bovenkerk & Lonneke Poort - 2020 - In B. Fischer (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Animal Ethics.
To Regulate or Not to Regulate? The Future of Animal Ethics in Experimental Research with Insects.Christopher Freelance - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (5):1339-1355.
How Do Human-Animal Emotional Relationships Influence Public Perceptions of Animal Use?Laura Cox & Tamara Montrose - 2016 - Journal of Animal Ethics 6 (1):44-53.
Animal experimentation.Alastair Norcross - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Raising the Bar in the Justification of Animal Research.Elisa Galgut - 2015 - Journal of Animal Ethics 5 (1):5-19,.
Against the use of knowledge gained from animal experimentation.Rebecca Tuvel - 2015 - Societies 1 (5).
Review of Tom L. Beauchamp and David DeGrazia PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL RESEARCH ETHICS. [REVIEW]Nathan Nobis - forthcoming - Bioethics.
Animal experimentation and scientific knowledge: a thought style?Thales de Astrogildo E. Tréz - unknown
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Making the anaesthetised animal into a boundary object: an analysis of the 1875 Royal Commission on Vivisection.Tarquin Holmes & Carrie Friese - 2020 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 42 (4):1-28.
Critiquing imaginaries of ‘the public’ in UK dialogue around animal research: Insights from the Mass Observation Project.Renelle McGlacken & Pru Hobson-West - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91 (C):280-287.
From Experimental Interaction to the Brain as the Epistemic Object of Neurobiology.Gesa Lindemann - 2009 - Human Studies 32 (2):153-181.
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance.Sarah Hartley & Carmen McLeod - 2018 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 43 (4):723-741.
References found in this work
Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation, and Subjectivity.Julian Henriques, Wendy Hollway, Cathy Urwin, Couze Venn & Valerie Walkerdine - 1998 - Routledge.
Animals in biomedical research: The undermining effect of the rhetoric of the besieged.John P. Gluck & Steven R. Kubacki - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (3):157 – 173.