Accounting for Animal Experiments: Identity and Disreputable "Others"

Science, Technology and Human Values 19 (2):189-204 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article considers how scientists involved in animal experimentation attempt to defend their practices. Interviews with over 40 scientists revealed that, over and above direct criticisms of the antivivisection lobby, scientists used a number of discursive strategies to demonstrate that critics of animal experimentation are ethically and epistemologically infenor to British scientific practitioners. The scientists portrayed a series of negative "others" such as foreign scientists, farmers, and pet owners. In this manner, they attempted to create a "socioethical domain" which rhetorically insulated them from criticism while simultaneously problematizing the critiques of the anti- animal-experimentation public. Some of the implications for relations between science and the public, especially regarding scientific credibility, are discussed.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,199

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animal experimentation.Roman Kolar - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):111-122.
Animal experimentation.Alastair Norcross - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Raising the Bar in the Justification of Animal Research.Elisa Galgut - 2015 - Journal of Animal Ethics 5 (1):5-19,.


Added to PP

8 (#988,190)

6 months
7 (#116,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Lynda Birke
University of Manchester