Ethics and social science: Which kind of co-operation? [Book Review]

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (4):319-336 (1999)
The relation between ethics and social science is often conceived as complementary, both disciplines cooperating in the solution of concrete moral problems. Against this, the paper argues that not only applied ethics but even certain parts of general ethics have to incorporate sociological and psychological data and theories from the start. Applied ethics depends on social science in order to asses the impact of its own principles on the concrete realities which these principles are to regulate as well as in order to propose practice rules suited to adapt these principles to their respective contexts of application. Examples from medical ethics (embryo research) and ecological ethics (Leopold's land ethic) illustrate both the contingence of practice rules in relation to their underlying basic principles and the corresponding need for a co-operation between philosophy and empirical disciplines in judging their functional merits and demerits. In conclusion, the relevance of empirical hypotheses even for some of the perennial problems of ethics is shown by clarifying the role played by empirical theories in the controversies about the ethical differentiation between positive and negative responsibility and the relation between utility maximisation and (seemingly) independent criteria of distributive justice in the context of social distributions.
Keywords applied ethics  consequentialism  distributive justice  ethical methodology  social science  utilitarianism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1009903815157
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,334
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Empirical Ethics, Context-Sensitivity, and Contextualism.Albert W. Musschenga - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):467 – 490.

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
40 ( #144,899 of 2,225,156 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #140,567 of 2,225,156 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature