Alexander James Bird
Cambridge University
Thomas Kuhn was undoubtedly the strongest influence on the philosophy of science in the last third of the twentieth century. Yet today, at the beginning of the twenty-first century it is unclear what his legacy really is. In the philosophy of science there is no characteristically Kuhnian school. This could be because we are all Kuhnians now. But it might also be because Kuhn’s thought, although revolutionary in its time, has since been superseded. In a sense both may be true. We are all Copernicans—yet almost everything Copernicus believed we now disbelieve. In this paper I shall examine the development of Kuhn’s thought in connection with changes in the philosophy of science during the second half of the twentieth century. Now that philosophy in general, philosophy of science in particular, is in a post-positivist era, we all share Kuhn’s rejection of positivism. But we do not, for the most part, share Kuhn’s belief in incommensurability, or his scepticism about truth and objective knowledge. Just as in Copernicus’ case, Kuhn initiated a revolution that went far beyond what he himself envisaged or even properly understood.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.4288/jafpos1956.12.61
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,077
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Meaning of 'Meaning'.Hillary Putnam - 1975 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7:131-193.
Identity and Necessity.Saul A. Kripke - 1971 - In Milton Karl Munitz (ed.), Identity and Individuation. New York: New York University Press. pp. 135-164.
The Road Since Structure.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:3-13.
Reflections on My Critics.Ts Khn - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
The Trouble with the Historical Philosophy of Science.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1992 - Dept. Of the History of Science, Harvard University.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rereading Kuhn.Jouni‐Matti Kuukkanen - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (2):217 – 224.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kuhn and Twentieth Century Philosophy of Science.Alexander Bird - 2004 - Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 12 (2):1-14.
Nauka i wartościowania — uwagi o kondycji filozoficznej refleksji nad nauką.Trela Grzegorz - 2014 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 4 (2):277-298.
Kuhn and the Historiography of Science.Alexander Bird - 2015 - In Alisa Bokulich & William J. Devlin (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On. Springer Verlag.
Idealistische Häresien in der Wissenschaftsphilosophie: Cassirer, Carnap Und Kuhn.Thomas Mormann - 1999 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 30 (2):233 - 270.
TS Kuhn a teória vedeckých revolúcií.Jozef Viceník - 1997 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 4 (4):337-358.


Added to PP index

Total views
396 ( #22,268 of 2,454,543 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,188 of 2,454,543 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes