Kantian themes in contemporary philosophy: Graham Bird

Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):131–152 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX


[Michael Friedman] This paper considers the extent to which Kant's vision of a distinctively 'transcendental' task for philosophy is essentially tied to his views on the foundations of the mathematical and physical sciences. Contemporary philosophers with broadly Kantian sympathies have attempted to reinterpret his project so as to isolate a more general philosophical core not so closely tied to the details of now outmoded mathematical-physical theories (Euclidean geometry and Newtonian physics). I consider two such attempts, those of Strawson and McDowell, and argue that they fundamentally distort the original Kantian impulse. I then consider Buchdahl's attempt to preserve the link between Kantian philosophy and the sciences while simultaneously generalizing Kant's doctrines in light of later scientific developments. I argue that Buchdahl's view, while not adequate as in interpretation of Kant in his own eighteenth century context, is nonetheless suggestive of an historicized and relativized revision of Kantianism that can do justice to both Kant's original philosophical impulse and the radical changes in the sciences that have occurred since Kant's day. /// [Graham Bird] Michael Friedman criticises some recent accounts of Kant which 'detach' his transcendental principles from the sciences, and do so in order to evade naturalism. I argue that Friedman's rejection of that 'detachment' is ambiguous. In its strong form, which I claim Kant rejects, the principles of Euclidean geometry and Newtonian physics are represented as transcendental principles. In its weak form, which I believe Kant accepts, it treats those latter principles as higher order conditions of the possibility of both science and ordinary experience. I argue also that the appeal to naturalism is unhelpful because that doctrine is seriously unclear, and because the accounts Friedman criticises are open to objections independent of any appeal to naturalism



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,102

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant's theory of knowledge.Graham Bird - 1962 - New York,: Humanities Press.
The trouble with Kant.Graham Bird - 1999 - Philosophy 74 (4):587-594.
McDowell's Kant: "Mind and World". [REVIEW]Graham Bird - 1996 - Philosophy 71 (276):219 - 243.
Review: Abela, Kant's empirical realism. [REVIEW]Graham Bird - 2004 - European Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):127–131.
Kant and naturalism.Graham Bird - 1995 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (2):399 – 408.
X.--new books. [REVIEW]Graham Bird - 1956 - Mind 65 (1):415-416.
Austin's Theory of Illocutionary Force.Graham Bird - 1981 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6 (1):345-370.
The necessity of Kant.Graham Bird - 1959 - Mind 68 (271):389-392.


Added to PP

73 (#210,325)

6 months
4 (#404,301)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Replies to my Critics.Graham Bird - 2011 - Kantian Review 16 (2):257-282.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references