Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (4):511-42 (2002)

Alexander James Bird
Cambridge University
Debates concerning the analysis of the concept of law of nature must address the following problem. On the one hand, our grasp of laws of nature is via our knowledge of their instances. And this seems not only an epistemological truth but also a semantic one. The concept of a law of nature must be explicated in terms of the things that instantiate the law. It is not simply that a piece of metal that conducts electricity is evidence for a law that metals conduct electricity. It is also the case that to explicate what it is for there to be such a law requires, and requires little more than, alluding to the fact that the piece of metal conducting electricity is an instance of that law. This is the driving intuition behind regularity theories of laws — to understand the concept ‘law,’ as in ‘it is a law that metals conduct electricity’ one need only understand little more than what it is for something to be a metal and to conduct electricity and the concept of universal generalization. On this view a law just is a regularity (or some kind of regularity) among its instances.
Keywords laws
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0045-5091
DOI 10.1080/00455091.2002.10716529
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,323
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Content Preservation.Tyler Burge - 1993 - Philosophical Review 102 (4):457-488.
Aspects of Scientific Explanation.Asa Kasher - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (4):747-749.
Fact, Fiction and Forecast.Edward H. Madden - 1955 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 16 (2):271-273.
Theory-Dependent Terms.David Papineau - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (1):1-20.
Nomic Probability.John L. Pollock - 1984 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9 (1):177-204.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Explanation and Metaphysics.Alexander Bird - 2005 - Synthese 143 (1-2):89-107.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Concept of Physical Law.Norman Swartz - 1985 - Cambridge University Press.
Nomological and Transcendental Criteria for Scientific Laws.Predrag Šustar - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):533-544.
Nailed to Hume's Cross?John Carroll - 2008 - In Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Blackwell. pp. 67--81.
Unexpected a Posteriori Necessary Laws of Nature.Alexander Bird - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (4):533 – 548.
The Laws of War.Jeff McMahan - 2010 - In Samantha Besson & John Tasioulas (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford University Press.
Necessarily, Salt Dissolves in Water.Alexander Bird - 2001 - Analysis 61 (4):267–274.


Added to PP index

Total views
223 ( #44,903 of 2,448,730 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #445,641 of 2,448,730 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes