Biology and Philosophy 36 (5):1-14 (2021)

This is a response to the nine commentaries on our target article “Unlimited Associative Learning: A primer and some predictions”. Our responses are organized by theme rather than by author. We present a minimal functional architecture for Unlimited Associative Learning that aims to tie to together the list of capacities presented in the target article. We explain why we discount higher-order thought theories of consciousness. We respond to the criticism that we have overplayed the importance of learning and underplayed the importance of spatial modelling. We decline the invitation to add a negative marker to our proposed positive marker so as to rule out consciousness in plants, but we nonetheless maintain that there is no positive evidence of consciousness in plants. We close by discussing how UAL relates to development and to its material substrate.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10539-021-09802-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

In Search of the Origins of Consciousness. [REVIEW]Jonathan Birch - 2020 - Acta Biotheoretica 68 (2):287-294.


Added to PP index

Total views
25 ( #455,788 of 2,507,017 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #38,602 of 2,507,017 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes