Medicine Studies 1 (2):95-104 (2009)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
One moot point in bioethical debates about genetic testing concerns the conditions that have to be fulfilled to make individual genetic testing or individual participation in genetic screening programs truly voluntary. Though there is a relatively broad consensus about the non-viability of views on the extremes of the spectrum of opinions, there is considerable disagreement in the middle. This mirrors the difficulties in defining satisfactory demarcation lines between autonomous choice, pressured choice and coercion in cases in which the decision to participate is triggered, wholly or partly, by factors such as material incentives, urgent health needs, massive social expectations, or moral pressure from relatives. In this contribution, some of the semantic conditions and ethical principles concerning coercion are explored with a view to applying them to genetic testing, especially in the context of insurance and participation in clinical trials
|
Keywords | Genetic testing Coercion Voluntariness |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1007/s12376-009-0012-x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 11 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Who Should Be Tested in a Pandemic? Ethical Considerations. [REVIEW]Niklas Juth, Gert Helgesson & Sven Ove Hansson - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-11.
Similar books and articles
Ethics and Genetics: Susceptibility Testing in the Workplace. [REVIEW]Chris MacDonald & Bryn Williams-Jones - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 35 (3):235 - 241.
Genetic Testing: A Conceptual Exploration.R. L. Zimmern - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):151-156.
Private and Public Eugenics: Genetic Testing and Screening in India. [REVIEW]Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):217-228.
Parental Authority, Future Autonomy, and Assessing Risks of Predictive Genetic Testing in Minors.A. Boyce & P. Borry - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):379-385.
Argumentation and Risk Communication About Genetic Testing: Challenges for Healthcare Consumers and Implications for Computer Systems.Nancy L. Green - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):113-129.
Are Genetic Self-Tests Dangerous? Assessing the Commercialization of Genetic Testing in Terms of Personal Autonomy.Ludvig Beckman - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (5-6):387-398.
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and the 'New' Eugenics.D. S. King - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):176-182.
Predictive Genetic Testing for Conditions That Present in Childhood.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.
Ethical Issues in Predictive Genetic Testing: A Public Health Perspective.K. G. Fulda - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):143-147.
Genetic Tests in the Insurance System: Criteria for a Moral Evaluation.Felix Thiele - 2003 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (3):185-195.
Genetic Testing: The Appropriate Means for a Desired Goal?Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):167-177.
The Relative Importance of Undesirable Truths.Lisa Bortolotti - 2012 - Medicine Healthcare and Philosophy (4):683-690.
Privacy and the Human Genome Project.David L. Wiesenthal & Neil I. Wiener - 1996 - Ethics and Behavior 6 (3):189 – 202.
Autonomy and Freedom of Choice in Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis.Elisabeth Hildt - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):65-72.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-12-01
Total views
26 ( #441,285 of 2,518,488 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,488 )
2013-12-01
Total views
26 ( #441,285 of 2,518,488 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,488 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads