The Autonomy of Social Epistemology

Episteme 2 (1):65-78 (2005)
Abstract
Social epistemology is autonomous: When applied to the same evidential situations, the principles of social rationality and the principles of individual rationality sometimes recommend inconsistent beliefs. If we stipulate that reasoning rationally from justified beliefs to a true belief is normally sufficient for knowledge, the autonomy thesis implies that some knowledge is essentially social. When the principles of social and individual rationality are applied to justified evidence and recommend inconsistent beliefs and the belief endorsed by social rationality is true, then that true belief would be an instance of social knowledge but not individual knowledge
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2006
DOI 10.3366/epi.2005.2.1.65
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,300
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Epistemology and Cognition.Alvin I. Goldman - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1955 - Harvard University Press.
In Defense of Pure Reason.Laurence BonJour - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
Can Human Irrationality Be Experimentally Demonstrated?L. Jonathan Cohen - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):317-370.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Fast and Frugal Heuristics.Michael A. Bishop - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (2):201–223.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2010-07-11

Total downloads
26 ( #201,274 of 2,193,232 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #95,890 of 2,193,232 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature