Responsibility – Reciprocity or Asymmetry? (Responsibility in Martin Buber’s Thought)

Michał Bizoń
Jagiellonian University
The submitted contribution is devoted to the controversy in Martin Buber’s conception of responsibility and especially to the question whether its nature is reciprocal or asymmetrical. This controversy arises from a misunderstanding and misinterpretation of his concept of mutuality as a constituent of I-Thou relation. Several refuting arguments are offered against the claim that the mutuality of the I-Thou relationship means equality of responsibility which enables ethical calculus.
Keywords esponsibility  mutuality  asymmetry  ethical calculus
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,756
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Apparent Asymmetry of Responsibility.Avner de-Shalit & Jonathan Wolff - 2011 - In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.
Mutuality: The Vision of Martin Buber.Donald L. Berry - 1985 - State University of New York Press.
Autonomy, Reciprocity, and Responsibility: Darwall and Levinas on the Second Person.Michael D. Barber - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (5):629 – 644.
Two Paradigms of Faith. Martin Buber on Judaism and Christianity.Iulia Grad - 2007 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 6 (17):34-46.
Free Will and Moral Responsibility.John Martin Fischer - 2004 - In David Copp (ed.), Handbook on Ethical Theory. Oxford University Press.
Responsibility and Rational Abilities: Defending an Asymmetrical View.Dana K. Nelkin - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4):497-515.


Added to PP index

Total views
1 ( #1,418,989 of 2,333,947 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #585,936 of 2,333,947 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes