Journal of Ethics 16 (4):367-393 (2012)

Authors
Gunnar Björnsson
Stockholm University
Abstract
Many philosophers think that moral objectivism is supported by stable features of moral discourse and thinking. When engaged in moral reasoning and discourse, people behave ‘as if’ objectivism were correct, and the seemingly most straightforward way of making sense of this is to assume that objectivism is correct; this is how we think that such behavior is explained in paradigmatically objectivist domains. By comparison, relativist, error-theoretic or non-cognitivist accounts of this behavior seem contrived and ad hoc. After explaining why this argument should be taken seriously, I argue that it is nevertheless undermined by considerations of moral disagreement. Even if the metaphysical, epistemic and semantic commitments of objectivism provide little or no evidence against it, and even if the alternative explanations of ‘objectivist’ traits of moral discourse and thinking are speculative or contrived, objectivism is itself incapable of making straightforward sense of these traits. Deep and widespread moral disagreement or, rather, the mere appearance of such disagreement, strongly suggests that the explanations operative in paradigmatically objective discourse fail to carry over to the moral case. Since objectivism, no less than relativism, non-cognitivism and error-theories, needs non-trivial explanations of why we behave ‘as if’ objectivism were correct, such behavior does not presently provide reason to accept objectivism.
Keywords Moral absolutism  Moral disagreement  Moral objectivism  Moral semantics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10892-012-9131-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

On What Matters: Two-Volume Set.Derek Parfit - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
The Sources of Normativity.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 126 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Revisiting Folk Moral Realism.Thomas Pölzler - 2017 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8 (2):455-476.
How to Measure Moral Realism.Thomas Pölzler - 2018 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9 (3):647-670.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Argument From Moral Experience.Don Loeb - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (5):469-484.
Practical Ethics and Moral Objectivism.Margarita M. Valdés - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:73-81.
El reino de los derechos y la objetividad de la moral.J. J. Moreso - 2003 - Análisis Filosófico 23 (2):117-150.
Moral Indeterminacy.Russell Scott Shafer-Landau - 1992 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Pain for the Moral Error Theory? A New Companions-in-Guilt Argument.Guy Fletcher - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):474-482.
Brogaard's Moral Contextualism.Lars Binderup - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):410–415.
Moral Objectivism and a Punishing God.Hagop Sarkissian & Mark Phelan - 2019 - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 80:1-7.
Virtue and the Reductivist Challenge.Michael Byron - 2000 - Contemporary Philosophy 22:34-41.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
635 ( #7,360 of 2,330,621 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #12,224 of 2,330,621 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes