Dynamical learning algorithms for neural networks and neural constructivism

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):559-559 (1997)
Abstract
The present commentary addresses the Quartz & Sejnowski (Q&S) target article from the point of view of the dynamical learning algorithm for neural networks. These techniques implicitly adopt Q&S's neural constructivist paradigm. Their approach hence receives support from the biological and psychological evidence. Limitations of constructive learning for neural networks are discussed with an emphasis on grammar learning.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X97251587
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,386
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is the Learning Paradox Resolved?M. E. J. Raijmakers - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):573-574.
The Fables of Lucy R.: Association and Dissociation in Neural Networks.Dan Lloyd - 1998 - In Dan J. Stein & J. Ludick (eds.), Neural Networks and Psychopathology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 248--273.
A Step in the Right Direction.Mary Ann Metzger - 1993 - Journal Od Mathematical Psychology 37 (3):477-485.
Out of Their Minds: Legal Theory in Neural Networks. [REVIEW]Hunter Dan - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3):129-151.
Some Neural Networks Compute, Others Don't.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2008 - Neural Networks 21 (2-3):311-321.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
11 ( #473,230 of 2,266,873 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #372,714 of 2,266,873 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature