Divergence of Duty: Differences in Legal and Ethical Responsibilities

Journal of Mass Media Ethics 14 (4):213-230 (1999)
Focusing on media actions surrounding the initial shootout between the Branch Davidian religious group and agents of the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms outside Waco, Texas, in 1993, this article examines legal and ethical duties of the media. Using the legal concept of negligence and the work of several philosophers, the article concludes first that the media did not violate their legal duties but did violate the ethical duty to minimize harm and second that although law and ethical intertwine and often share vocabulary, they are different
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1207/S15327728JMME1404_2
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,433
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Jeffrey Nesteruk (1991). The Ethical Significance of Corporate Law. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (9):723 - 727.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

13 ( #333,039 of 1,925,077 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #418,130 of 1,925,077 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.