Existential Suffering and The Extent of the Right to Physician Assisted Suicide in Switzerland

Medical Law Review 22 (1):109-118 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Gross v Switzerland, the European Court of Human Rights held by 4-3 majority that Switzerland had violated the right to decide when and how to die included in the right to respect for private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. To comply with the ruling, Switzerland must issue guidance detailing the circumstances (if any) under which physicians may lawfully prescribe lethal medication to competent individuals who have a voluntary and settled wish to die, yet whose suffering is not the product of a medical condition likely to result in death in the near future.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A postscript to Gross v Switzerland.Isra Black - 2014 - Medical Law Review 22 (4):656.
Just when you thought the euthanasia debate had died.Alan Rothschild - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (1):69-78.
Ending Life, Morality, and Meaning.Jukka Varelius - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):559-574.
Easeful death: is there a case for assisted dying?Mary Warnock - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Elisabeth Macdonald.
Physician-Assisted Suicide: Where to Draw the Line?Ernlé W. D. Young - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (3):407-410.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-14

Downloads
27 (#576,320)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references