Dialogue 32 (2):219- (1993)

Authors
Deborah Black
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
Abstract
One of the chief innovations in medieval adaptations of Aristotelian psychology was the expansion of Aristotle's notion of imagination orphantasiato include a variety of distinct perceptual powers known collectively as the internal senses. Amongst medieval philosophers in the Arabic world, Avicenna offers one of the most complex and sophisticated accounts of the internal senses. Within his list of internal senses, Avicenna includes a faculty known as “estimation”, to which various functions are assigned in a wide variety of contexts. Although many philosophers in the Arabic world as well as in the Latin West accepted Avicenna's positing of an estimative faculty, Avicenna's best-known critics, al-Ghazâlî and Averroes, found Avicenna's arguments in support of a distinct estimative faculty problematic. For different reasons, both Averroes and Ghazâlî raised the basic question of whether one needed to posit a distinct faculty of estimation to supplement the perceptual abilities of the other internal senses, and whether the notion of an estimative power as defined by Avicenna was internally coherent. Such criticisms suggest that the Avicennian conception of estimation is not entirely unambiguous, and that a correct understanding of Avicenna's motivations for delineating an estimative power requires a careful study of the diverse activities assigned to it throughout Avicenna's philosophical writings.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0012217300014414
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,825
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

An Aristotelian Theory of Consciousness?D. M. Modrak - 1981 - Ancient Philosophy 1 (2):160-170.
Introduction: Ghazali on Ethical Premises.Michael Marmura - 1969 - Philosophical Forum 1 (3):393.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Abū Bakr Al-Rāzī on Animals.Peter Adamson - 2012 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94 (3):249-273.
Abduction and Estimation in Animals.Woosuk Park - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (4):321-337.
Ibn Sînâ (Avicenna) and René Descartes on the Faculty of Imagination.Hulya Yaldir - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2):247-278.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Making Abstraction Less Abstract.Jon McGinnis - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:169-183.
Avicenna and the Problem of Universals.Raja Bahlul - 2009 - Philosophy and Theology 21 (1/2):3-25.
Avicenna and Tusi on the Contradiction and Conversion of the Absolute.Tony Street - 2000 - History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (1):45-56.
On Knowledge of Particulars.Peter Adamson - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (3):273–294.
Avicenna and Ūsī on Modal Logic.Henrik Lagerlund - 2009 - History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (3):227-239.
Aristotle and Two Medieval Aristotelians on the Nature of God.R. E. Houser - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):355 - 375.
Avicenna.Deborah L. Black - 1994 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (4):665-667.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-25

Total views
57 ( #172,899 of 2,401,526 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #257,496 of 2,401,526 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes