Frozen Embryos and The Obligation to Adopt

Bioethics (8):1-5 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Rob Lovering has developed an interesting new critique of views that regard embryos as equally valuable as other human beings: the moral argument for frozen human embryo adoption. The argument is aimed at those who believe that the death of a frozen embryo is a very bad thing, and Lovering concludes that some who hold this view ought to prevent one of these deaths by adopting and gestating a frozen embryo. Contra Lovering, we show that there are far more effective strategies for preserving the lives of frozen embryos than adoption. Moreover, we point out that those who regard the deaths of frozen embryos as a very bad thing will generally regard the deaths of all embryos as a very bad thing, whether they are discarded embryos, aborted embryos or embryos that spontaneously abort. This entails these other embryos must be taken into account when considering moral obligations, as well as other human lives at risk from preventable causes.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

All Embryos are Equal?Daniel Holbrook - 2007 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (1):43-53.
The embryo rescue case.S. Matthew Liao - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2):141-147.
Eugenic Selection Benefits Embryos.Mark Walker - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (5):214-224.
Embryo disposition and the new death scene.David Ellison & Isabel Karpin - 2011 - Cultural Studies Review 17 (1):81-100.
Adoption first? The disposition of human embryos.Timothy F. Murphy - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (6):392-395.


Added to PP

497 (#21,994)

6 months
77 (#18,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Bruce P. Blackshaw
University of Birmingham
Nicholas Colgrove
Wake Forest University