How can analysis be informative?

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 1946
DOI 10.2307/2103114
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,195
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Status of the Knowledge Account of Assertion.Frank Hindriks - 2007 - Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (3):393-406.
The Logic of Theory Assessment.Franz Huber - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (5):511-538.
Reasons as Evidence.Stephen Kearns & Daniel Star - 2009 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4:215-42.
Philosophical Analysis.Max Black - 1963 - Freeport, N.Y., Books for Libraries Press.
The Paradoxes of Analysis and Synonymy.S. D. Rieber - 1994 - Erkenntnis 41 (1):103 - 116.
The Logic of Confirmation and Theory Assessment.Franz Huber - 2005 - In L. Behounek & M. Bilkova (eds.), The Logica Yearbook. Filosofia.
Hempel's Logic of Confirmation.Franz Huber - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 139 (2):181 - 189.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

198 ( #20,949 of 2,163,981 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,017 of 2,163,981 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums