Hempel Carl G. and Oppenheim Paul. A definition of “degree of confirmation.” Philosophy of science, vol. 12 , pp. 98–115 [Book Review]

Journal of Symbolic Logic 11 (1):18-19 (1946)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A definition of "degree of confirmation".Carl G. Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1945 - Philosophy of Science 12 (2):98-115.
Confirmation and prediction.G. H. Merrill - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (1):98-117.
Studies in the logic of explanation.Carl Gustav Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135-175.
Reply to David L. Miller's comments.Carl G. Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (4):350-352.
Does the Bayesian solution to the paradox of confirmation really support Bayesianism?Brian Laetz - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (1):39-46.
The paradox of confirmation.Branden Fitelson - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (1):95–113.
On the equivalence of Goodman’s and Hempel’s paradoxes.Kenneth Boyce - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 45:32-42.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
43 (#362,182)

6 months
20 (#126,159)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references