Julius Caesar Scaliger on Plant Generation and the Question of Species Constancy

Early Science and Medicine 15 (3):266-286 (2010)

Authors
Abstract
The sixteenth-century physician and philosopher Julius Caesar Scaliger combines the view that living beings are individuated by a single substantial form with the view that the constituents of the organic body retain their identity due to the continued existence and operation of their own substantial forms. This essay investigates the implications of Scaliger's account of subordinate and dominant substantial forms for the question of the constancy of biological species. According to Scaliger, biological mutability involves not only change on the ontological level of accidents but, in some cases, also change on the level of substantial forms. While he shares the received view that substantial forms themselves cannot undergo change, he maintains that relations of domination and subordination between substantial forms can undergo change. He uses his theory of how such changes can occur to explain cases of revertible plant degeneration. Moreover, in his view plants that belong to previously unknown biological species can emerge from changes in the relations between the many forms contained in plant seeds
Keywords LATIN PLURALISM   NATURAL TELEOLOGY   ARISTOTLE'S BIOLOGY   PSEUDO-ARISTOTLE'S DE PLANTIS   MIXTURE   SPECIES MUTABILITY   SPECIES MEMBERSHIP   COMPOSITE SUBSTANCES   PLANT DEGENERATION   THEOPHRASTUS' BIOLOGY   BIOLOGICAL REPRODUCTION   SUBSTANTIAL FORMS   JULIUS CAESAR SCALIGER
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/157338210x493950
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,999
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Julius Caesar Scaliger on Corpuscles and the Vacuum.Andreas Blank - 2008 - Perspectives on Science 16 (2):pp. 137-159.
Cento e quarenta anons sem Charles Darwin bastam: sobre variedades, espécies, e definições.Ricardo Waizbort - 2000 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 4 (1):141-184.
Julius Caesar Scaliger's Poetics.David Marsh - 2004 - Journal of the History of Ideas 65 (4):667-676.
What is a Species? Essences and Generation.John S. Wilkins - 2010 - Theory in Biosciences 129:141-148.
The Cladistic Solution to the Species Problem.Mark Ridley - 1989 - Biology and Philosophy 4 (1):1-16.
Species Pluralism Does Not Imply Species Eliminativism.Ingo Brigandt - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1305–1316.
Eliminative Pluralism.Marc Ereshefsky - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (4):671-690.
Microbiology and the Species Problem.Marc Ereshefsky - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):553-568.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-19

Total views
20 ( #431,359 of 2,266,725 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #349,346 of 2,266,725 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature