Memory, History, Forgetting

Chicago: University of Chicago Press (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Why do major historical events such as the Holocaust occupy the forefront of the collective consciousness, while profound moments such as the Armenian genocide, the McCarthy era, and France's role in North Africa stand distantly behind? Is it possible that history "overly remembers" some events at the expense of others? A landmark work in philosophy, Paul Ricoeur's _Memory, History, Forgetting_ examines this reciprocal relationship between remembering and forgetting, showing how it affects both the perception of historical experience and the production of historical narrative. _Memory, History, Forgetting_, like its title, is divided into three major sections. Ricoeur first takes a phenomenological approach to memory and mnemonical devices. The underlying question here is how a memory of present can be of something absent, the past. The second section addresses recent work by historians by reopening the question of the nature and truth of historical knowledge. Ricoeur explores whether historians, who can write a history of memory, can truly break with all dependence on memory, including memories that resist representation. The third and final section is a profound meditation on the necessity of forgetting as a condition for the possibility of remembering, and whether there can be something like happy forgetting in parallel to happy memory. Throughout the book there are careful and close readings of the texts of Aristotle and Plato, of Descartes and Kant, and of Halbwachs and Pierre Nora. A momentous achievement in the career of one of the most significant philosophers of our age, _Memory, History, Forgetting_ provides the crucial link between Ricoeur's _Time and Narrative_ and _Oneself as Another_ and his recent reflections on ethics and the problems of responsibility and representation. “His success in revealing the internal relations between recalling and forgetting, and how this dynamic becomes problematic in light of events once present but now past, will inspire academic dialogue and response but also holds great appeal to educated general readers in search of both method for and insight from considering the ethical ramifications of modern events.... It is indeed a master work, not only in Ricoeur’s own vita but also in contemporary European philosophy.”—_Library Journal _“Ricoeur writes the best kind of philosophy—critical, economical, and clear.”— _New York Times Book Review _



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,726

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Memory, History, Forgetting.Kathleen Blamey & David Pellauer (eds.) - 2006 - University of Chicago Press.
Memory, history, forgetting.Paul Ricœur - 2004 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Memory, History, Forgetting.Paul Ricoeur - 2004 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Memory, History, Forgetting.Michael R. Kelly - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):675-677.
Memory, History, Forgetting. [REVIEW]Michael R. Kelly - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):675-677.
Paul Ricoeur, Memory, History, Forgetting. [REVIEW]Andrjez Wiercinski - 2005 - Bulletin de la Société Américaine de Philosophie de Langue Française 15 (2):105-111.
Guilty of history? The longue durée of Paul Ricoeur.Hayden White - 2007 - History and Theory 46 (2):233–251.


Added to PP

11 (#1,176,043)

6 months
5 (#879,562)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?