Report on Analysis Problem no. 3: "Does the Logical Truth (Ǝx) (Fx v ∼ Fx) Entail That at Least One Individual Exists?"

Analysis 14 (1):1 - 5 (1953)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/14.1.1
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,349
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
That Truth Exists is More Logical.Noriaki Iwasa - 2011 - Think 10 (27):109-112.
On Horwich's Way Out.Panu Raatikainen - 2005 - Analysis 65 (3):175-177.
The T-Schema is Not a Logical Truth.R. T. Cook - 2012 - Analysis 72 (2):231-239.
A (Leibnizian) Theory of Concepts.Edward N. Zalta - 2000 - Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 3:137-183.
Alethic Pluralism, Generic Truth, and Mixed Conjunctions.Roy T. Cook - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):624-629.
On Using Inconsistent Expressions.Arvid Båve - 2012 - Erkenntnis 77 (1):133-148.
Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total downloads
52 ( #103,548 of 2,193,295 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,646 of 2,193,295 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature