British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):85-88 (2010)
Peter Lamarque's splendid and informative book, The Philosphy of Literature , deserves a much fuller response than I can give in this brief note. It is brimful with insights into the nature of literature, and into the debates between philosophers interested in literature, and I cannot imagine anyone failing to learn from it. The question I propose to take up is by no means the most important that Lamarque raises, nor am I even certain that I can add anything useful to his own discussion of it. Yet I find myself puzzled by it, and hope that it may repay further thought
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Of Literature and Knowledge: Explorations in Narrative Thought Experiments, Evolution, and Game Theory.Peter Swirski - 2006 - Routledge.
Truth, Fiction, and Literature: A Philosophical Perspective.Lamarque Peter & Haugom Olsen Stein - 1994 - Oxford University Press.
Literature and Truth.Peter Lamarque - 2010 - In Garry Hagberg & Walter Jost (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature. Wiley-Blackwell.
Aesthetics and Literature: A Problematic Relation?Peter Lamarque - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (1):27 - 40.
Iris Murdoch: Work for the Spirit (Review).Peter Lamarque - 1983 - Philosophy and Literature 7 (1):131-132.
Added to index2010-01-09
Total downloads52 ( #96,074 of 2,143,762 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #280,273 of 2,143,762 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.