Authors
Tim Black
California State University, Northridge
Robert Gressis
California State University, Northridge
Abstract
Many think that the aim of Hume’s Dialogues is simply to discredit the design argument for the existence of an intelligent designer. We think instead that the Dialogues provides a model of true religion. We argue that, for Hume, the truly religious person: believes that an intelligent designer created and imposed order on the universe; grounds this belief in an irregular argument rooted in a certain kind of experience, for example, in the experience of anatomizing complex natural systems such as the eye; and retains this belief, on the basis of these reasons, even after careful scrutiny. We argue that two of the Dialogues’s characters, Philo and Cleanthes, exhibit true religion. A third character, Demea, exhibits false religion and a persistent impiety. Taken as a whole, we see the Dialogues as an educational performance for the benefit of Pamphilus, Cleanthes’s ward, as well as for the benefit of readers of the Dialogues. Specifically, we think, given that its lessons concern theology and the principles of religion, the dynamics of the Dialogues’s discussion and the interplay between its characters can be seen as a demonstration of a method for becoming truly religious.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/09608788.2016.1255175
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,118
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What's True About Hume's 'True Religion'?Don Garrett - 2012 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (2):199-220.
Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion.David Hume - 1779/1998 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophical Review. Blackwell. pp. 338-339.
.Antony Flew - 1976 - In ``The Presumption of Atheism&Quot. New York: Barnes & Noble.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What's True About Hume's 'True Religion'?Don Garrett - 2012 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (2):199-220.
Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion.B. M. Laing - 1937 - Philosophy 12 (46):175 - 190.
Irony and Argument in Dialogues, XII.Scott Davis - 1991 - Religious Studies 27 (2):239-257.
Animal Reason and the Imago Dei.David Werther - 1988 - Religious Studies 24 (3):325-335.
Religion and Science: A New Look at Hume's Dialogues.Wesley C. Salmon - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 33 (2):143 - 176.
Part IX of Hume's Dialogues.D. C. Stove - 1978 - Philosophical Quarterly 28 (113):300-309.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-26

Total views
42 ( #222,546 of 2,324,549 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #682,670 of 2,324,549 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes