Argumentation 15 (4):365-379 (2001)

Authors
John Anthony Blair
University of Windsor
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to advance the theory of argument or inference schemes by suggesting answers to questions raised by Walton's Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning (1996), specifically on: the relation between argument and reasoning; distinguishing deductive from presumptive schemes, the origin of schemes and the probative force of their use; and the motivation and justification for their associated critical questions.
Keywords argument schemes  critical questions  presumptive argument  presumptive reasoning  probative force  reasoning and argument  Walton
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1012021017836
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,261
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation.Trudy Gover - 2018 - Windsor: University of Windsor.
La nouvelle rhétorique.L. Olbrechts-Tyteca & Charles Perelman - 1956 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 11 (1):20 - 29.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Good Reasoning on the Toulmin Model.David Hitchcock - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):373-391.
Is Practical Reasoning Presumptive?Christian Kock - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):91-108.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mathematical Wit and Mathematical Cognition.Andrew Aberdein - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (2):231-250.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-11

Total views
73 ( #148,762 of 2,456,034 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,366 of 2,456,034 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes