A comprehensive theory of human mating must explain between-sex and within-sex differences in mating strategies

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):593-594 (2000)

Gangestad & Simpson make a major contribution by highlighting the importance of mate choice for good genes, the costs of alternative strategies, and tradeoffs inherent in human mating. By downplaying sex differences and ignoring the nongenetic adaptive benefits of short term mating, however, they undermine their goal of “strategic pluralism” by presenting a theory devoid of many documented complexities of human mating.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00293370
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,327
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Morning After the Night Before.Anne Campbell - 2008 - Human Nature 19 (2):157-173.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
48 ( #175,576 of 2,271,536 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #826,846 of 2,271,536 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature