Actual and non-actual motion: why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology


Authors
Johan Blomberg
Lund University
Abstract
Experientialist semantics has contributed to a broader notion of linguistic meaning by emphasizing notions such as construal, perspective, metaphor, and embodiment, but has suffered from an individualist concept of meaning and has conflated experiential motivations with conventional semantics. We argue that these problems can be redressed by methods and concepts from phenomenology, on the basis of a case study of sentences of non-actual motion such as “The mountain range goes all the way from Mexico to Canada.” Through a phenomenological reanalysis of proposals of Talmy, Langacker, and Matlock, we show that non-actual motion is both experientially and linguistically non-unitary. At least three different features of human consciousness—enactive perception, visual scanning, and imagination—constitute experiential motivations for non-actual motion sentences, and each of these could be related to phenomenological analyses of human intentionality. The second problem is addressed by proposing that the experiential motivations of non-actual motion sentences can be viewed as sedimented through “passive” processes of acquisition and social transmission and that this implies an interactive loop between experience and language, yielding losses in terms of original experience, but gains in terms of communal signification. Something that is underestimated by phenomenology is that what is sedimented are not only intentional objects such as states of affairs, but aspects of how they are given, i.e., the original, temporal, bodily experiences themselves. Since cognitive semantics has emphasized such aspects of meaning, we suggest that phenomenology can itself benefit from experientialist semantics, especially when it turns its focus from prepredicative to predicative, linguistic intentionality
Keywords Cognitive semantics  Fictive motion  Grounding  Language–consciousness interactionism  Mental simulation  Phenomenology  Sedimentation  Subjective motion
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11097-013-9299-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,049
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Perceptual Symbol Systems.Lawrence W. Barsalou - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):577-660.
The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason.Mark Johnson - 1989 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (4):400-401.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Semantics For Modal Calculi.J. Ivlev - 1988 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 17 (3-4):114-121.
Two Types of Rigid Designation.Iris Einheuser - 2005 - Dialectica 59 (3):367–374.
Lewis, Language, Lust and Lies.Max Kolbel - 1998 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):301-315.
Actual Entity and Actual Occasion.Joseph Bracken - 2017 - Process Studies 46 (2):270-284.
Actual and Ideal Infinitesimals in Leibniz’s Specimen Dynamicum.Tzuchien Tho - 2016 - Journal of Early Modern Studies 5 (1):115-142.
When Artists Fail: A Reply to Trivedi.Sheila Lintott - 2002 - British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):64-72.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-03-17

Total views
63 ( #128,091 of 2,260,175 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #493,552 of 2,260,175 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature