Alfred Tarski's work on general metamathematics

Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (1):36-50 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay we discuss Tarski's work on what he calledthe methodology of the deductive sciences, or more briefly, borrowing the terminology of Hilbert,metamathematics, The clearest statement of Tarski's views on this subject can be found in his textbookIntroduction to logic[41m].1Here he describes the tasks of metamathematics as “the detailed analysis and critical evaluation of the fundamental principles that are applied in the construction of logic and mathematics”. He goes on to describe what these fundamental principles are: All the expressions of the discipline under consideration must be defined in terms of a small group of primitive expressions that seem immediately understandable. Furthermore, only those statements of the discipline are accepted as valid that can be deduced by precisely defined and universally accepted means from a small set of axioms whose validity seems evident. The method of constructing a discipline in strict accordance with these principles is known as thedeductive method, and the disciplines constructed in this manner are calleddeductive systems. Since contemporary mathematical logic is one of those disciplines that are subject to these principles, it itself is a deductive science. Tarski then goes on to say:“The view has become more and more common that the deductive method is the only essential feature by means of which the mathematical disciplines can be distinguished from all other sciences; not only is every mathematical discipline a deductive theory, but also, conversely, every deductive theory is a mathematical discipline”.This identification of mathematics with the deductive sciences is in our view one of the distinctive aspects of Tarski's work. Another characteristic feature is his broad view of what constitutes the domain of metamathematical investigations. A clue to this aspect of his work can also be found in Chapter 6 ofIntroduction to logic. After a discussion of the notions of completeness and consistency, he remarks that the investigations concerning these topics were among the most important factors contributing to a considerable extension of the domain of methodological studies, and caused even a fundamental change in the whole character of the methodology of deductive sciences.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#421,600)

6 months
8 (#415,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Stalnaker and Field on Truth and Intentionality.Carol Ruth Gabriel - 1990 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Survey of Symbolic Logic.C. I. Lewis - 1918 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 17 (3):78-79.
Grundlagen der Mathematik.S. C. Kleene - 1940 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (1):16-20.
Combinatory Logic.Haskell B. Curry, J. Roger Hindley & Jonathan P. Seldin - 1977 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 42 (1):109-110.
The Mathematics of Metamathematics.Donald Monk - 1963 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (2):274-275.

View all 8 references / Add more references