Conversational Implicatures (and How to Spot Them)

Philosophy Compass 8 (2):170-185 (2013)
Authors
Michael Blome-Tillmann
McGill University
Abstract
In everyday conversations we often convey information that goes above and beyond what we strictly speaking say: exaggeration and irony are obvious examples. H.P. Grice introduced the technical notion of a conversational implicature in systematizing the phenomenon of meaning one thing by saying something else. In introducing the notion, Grice drew a line between what is said, which he understood as being closely related to the conventional meaning of the words uttered, and what is conversationally implicated, which can be inferred from the fact that an utterance has been made in context. Since Grice’s seminal work, conversational implicatures have become one of the major research areas in pragmatics. This article introduces the notion of a conversational implicature, discusses some of the key issues that lie at the heart of the recent debate, and explicates tests that allow us to reliably distinguish between semantic entailments and conventional implicatures on the one hand and conversational implicatures on the other.
Keywords conversational implicature  H.P. Grice  pragmatics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phc3.12003
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - Oxford University Press, Usa.
Studies in the Way of Words.H. Paul Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Literal Meaning.François Recanati - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

How to Do Things with Knowledge Ascriptions.Mikkel Gerken - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (1):223-234.
The Lying Test.Eliot Michaelson - 2016 - Mind and Language 31 (4):470-499.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Communication, Cooperation and Conflict.Steffen Borge - 2012 - ProtoSociology 29:223-241.
Scalar Implicature and Local Pragmatics.Bart Geurts - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (1):51-79.
A Problem About Conversational Implicature.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1979 - Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (1):19 - 25.
Imaginative Resistance and Conversational Implicature.Bence Nanay - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):586-600.
Value and Implicature.Stephen Finlay - 2005 - Philosophers' Imprint 5:1-20.
Do Conversational Implicatures Explain Substitutivity Failures?Cara Spencer - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):126–139.
Conversational Implicatures and Cancellability.Steffen Borge - 2009 - Acta Analytica 24 (2):149-154.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-11-12

Total downloads
7,189 ( #61 of 2,273,307 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
425 ( #509 of 2,273,307 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature