Information Asymmetries and the Paradox of Sustainable Business Models: Toward an integrated theory of sustainable entrepreneurship
Abstract
In this conceptual paper, the traditional conceptualization of sustainable entrepreneurship is challenged because of a fundamental tension between processes involved in sustainable development and processes involved in entrepreneurship: the concept of sustainable business models contains a paradox, because sustainability involves the reduction of information asymmetries, whereas entrepreneurship involves enhanced and secured levels of information asymmetries. We therefore propose a new and integrated theory of sustainable entrepreneurship that overcomes this paradox. The basic argument is that environmental problems have to be conceptualized as wicked problems or sustainability-related ecosystem failures. Because all actors involved in the entrepreneurial process are characterized by their epistemic insufficiency regarding the solving of these problems, the role of information in the sustainable entrepreneurial process changes. On the one hand, the reduction of information asymmetries primarily aims to enable actors to become critical of sustainable entrepreneurs’ actual business models. On the other hand, the epistemic insufficiency of sustainable entrepreneurs guarantees that information asymmetries remain as a source of new sustainable business opportunities. Three further characteristics of sustainable entrepreneurs are distinguished: sustainability and entrepreneurship-related risk-taking; sustainability and entrepreneurship-related self-efficacy; and the development of satisficing and open-ended solutions, together with multiple stakeholders.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Embodied Multi-Discursivity: An Aesthetic Process Approach to Sustainable Entrepreneurship.Oana Branzei, Paul Shrivastava & Kim Poldner - 2017 - Business and Society 56 (2):214-252.
A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship.Filipe M. Santos - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 111 (3):335-351.
The Three Dimensions of Sustainability: A Delicate Balancing Act for Entrepreneurs Made More Complex by Stakeholder Expectations.Denise Fischer, Malte Brettel & René Mauer - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 163 (1):87-106.
Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Is Entrepreneurial will Enough? A North–South Comparison.Martine Spence, Jouhaina Ben Boubaker Gherib & Viviane Ondoua Biwolé - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 99 (3):335-367.
Social Entrepreneurship in the Global Perspective: Internationalization of Social Entrepreneurship and Global Sustainable Development.Hyuk Kim - 2012 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 23:98-110.
Social entrepreneurship as a way of developing sustainable township economies.Semape J. Manyaka-Boshielo - 2017 - HTS Theological Studies 73 (4):1-10.
Toward Moral Responsibility Theories of Corporate Sustainability and Sustainable Supply Chain.Jung Ha-Brookshire - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 145 (2):227-237.
“It’s Not Easy Living a Sustainable Lifestyle”: How Greater Knowledge Leads to Dilemmas, Tensions and Paralysis.Cristina Longo, Avi Shankar & Peter Nuttall - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 154 (3):759-779.
Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Study in Disingenuity? [REVIEW]Güler Aras & David Crowther - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):279 - 288.
Communication and sustainable agriculture: Building agendas for research and practice. [REVIEW]Gerry Walter - 1992 - Agriculture and Human Values 9 (2):27-37.
A Stakeholder Perspective of Entrepreneurial Activity.Jeffrey S. Harrison - 2002 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2002:143-150.
Integrating Pragmatism and Ethics in Entrepreneurial Leadership for Sustainable Value Creation.Gita Surie & Allan Ashley - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 81 (1):235-246.
A Stakeholder Perspective of Entrepreneurial Activity: Beyond Normative Theory.Jeffrey S. Harrison - 2002 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 3:143-150.
On the Notion of Sustainability.Richard Raatzsch - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (4):361-385.
The Influence of Personality Traits and Demographic Factors on Social Entrepreneurship Start Up Intentions.Joyce Koe Hwee Nga & Gomathi Shamuganathan - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (2):259-282.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-02-16
Downloads
110 (#114,901)
6 months
45 (#29,987)
2019-02-16
Downloads
110 (#114,901)
6 months
45 (#29,987)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Towards a Philosophy of a Bio-Based Economy: A Levinassian Perspective on the Relations Between Economic and Ecological Systems.Roel Veraart & Vincent Blok - 2021 - Environmental Values 30 (2):169-192.
What Is (Business) Management? Laying the Ground for a Philosophy of Management.Vincent Blok - 2020 - Philosophy of Management 19 (2):173-189.
Efficiency Versus Enjoyment: Looking After the Human Condition in the Transition to the Bio-Based Economy.Vincent Blok & Roeland Christiaan Veraart - 2021 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34 (6):1-19.
Politics versus Economics Philosophical Reflections on the Nature of Corporate Governance.Vincent Blok - 2020 - Philosophy of Management 19 (1):69-87.
Xenophon’s Philosophy of Management.Vincent Blok - 2019 - In C. Neesham & S. Segal (eds.), Handbook of Philosophy of Management.
References found in this work
Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World.Timothy Morton - 2013 - Minneapolis: Univ of Minnesota Press.
Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework.Tobias Hahn, Jonatan Pinkse, Lutz Preuss & Frank Figge - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 127 (2):297-316.
Look who’s talking: Responsible Innovation, the paradox of dialogue and the voice of the other in communication and negotiation processes.Vincent Blok - 2014 - Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2):171-190.