Searle's arguments against cognitive science

In John M. Preston & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press. pp. 70--79 (2003)

Authors
Ned Block
New York University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Cognitive Science  Understanding  Searle, J
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,999
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Concrete Digital Computation: What Does It Take for a Physical System to Compute? [REVIEW]Nir Fresco - 2011 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (4):513-537.
Searle’s Wall.James Blackmon - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (1):109-117.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Scientific Study of Consciousness: Searle’s Radical Request.Mahesh Ananth - 2010 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 16 (2):59-89.
Searle on the Brink.Selmer Bringsjord - 1994 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 1.
The Ubiquity of Computation.Eric Dietrich - 1993 - Think (misc) 2 (June):27-29.
Searle's Experiments with Thought.William J. Rapaport - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (June):271-9.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
8 ( #946,439 of 2,410,650 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,271 of 2,410,650 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes