Searle's arguments against cognitive science
In John M. Preston & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press. pp. 70--79 (2003)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||Cognitive Science Understanding Searle, J|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
The Scientific Study of Consciousness: Searle’s Radical Request.Mahesh Ananth - 2010 - Psyche 16 (2):59-89.
Searle's Experiments with Thought.William J. Rapaport - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (June):271-9.
Fear and Loathing (and Other Intentional States) in Searle's Chinese Room.Dale Jacquette - 1990 - Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):287-304.
Searle's Chinese Box: Debunking the Chinese Room Argument. [REVIEW]Larry Hauser - 1997 - Minds and Machines 7 (2):199-226.
Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence.John M. Preston & John Mark Bishop (eds.) - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Russell's Structuralism and the Supposed Death of Computational Cognitive Science.Restrepo Echavarria Ricardo - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (2):181-197.
Russell's Structuralism and the Supposed Death of Computational Cognitive Science.Ricardo Restrepo - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (2):181-197.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #738,302 of 2,073,395 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #295,772 of 2,073,395 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.