Philosophical Quarterly 11 (42):1-9 (1961)
Why does aristotle say that the common sensibles are susceptible to error while the specific sensibles are not? various solutions of this problem are discussed and finally it is concluded that aristotle's meaning here is teleological. The specific senses were fashioned by nature to perceive the specific sensibles but not the common sensibles and so error sometimes (often) creeps in. The common sense is really not a sense faculty as the eye, The ear etc
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The ten Modes of Aenesidemus and the Myth of Ancient Scepticism.Stephen Gaukroger - 1995 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (2):371 – 387.
Aristotle on the Function of Sense Perception.Stephen Gaukroger - 1981 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 12 (1):75-89.
Similar books and articles
Gadamer's Praise of Theory: Aristotle's Friend and the Reciprocity Between Theory and Practice.Walter A. Brogan - 2002 - Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):141-155.
Alexander of Aphrodisias On Aristotle On Sense Perception.J. A. Towey - 2000 - Duckworth.
The Error In 'The Error In The Error Theory'.Richard Joyce - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):519-534.
Leibniz's Account of Error.Keya Maitra - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):63 – 73.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads78 ( #63,142 of 2,073,509 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #245,064 of 2,073,509 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.