Philosophical Quarterly 24 (94):27-36 (1974)
The usual strawsonian account of referring won't do for fictional entities. The problem is that we still don't have a sufficiently clear notion of ordinary referring, And the root of this problem is that referring is still perceived in terms of a paradigm relation of a description to an existing thing. But that relation is preceded by the more fundamental relation of thought to an object of thought, Whether real or imaginary. The conclusion reached is that fictional reference is an institutionalized partial use of ordinary referring, Parasitic on it though leading a legitimate life of its own
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Agency and Fictional Truth: A Formal Study on Fiction-Making.Giuseppe Spolaore - 2015 - Synthese 192 (5):1235-1265.
The Paradox (Es) of Pitying and Fearing Fictions.Jennifer Wilkinson - 2000 - South African Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):8-25.
Similar books and articles
Fictional Truth and Fictional Authors.David Davies - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (1):43-55.
A Syncretistic Ontology of Fictional Beings.Alberto Voltolini - 2013 - In T. Koblizek, P. Kot'atko & M. Pokorny (eds.), Text + Work: The Menard Case. Litteraria Pragensia. pp. 89-108.
Fictional Objects, Non-Existence, and the Principle of Characterization.Andrea Sauchelli - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 159 (1):139-146.
Pleonastic Entities: Fictional Characters and Propositions.Massimiliano Vignolo - 2009 - Philosophical Investigations 32 (1):65-78.
Description, Disagreement, and Fictional Names.Peter Alward - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):423-448.
How Fictional Works Are Related to Fictional Entities.Alberto Voltolini - 2003 - Dialectica 57 (2):225–238.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads66 ( #79,961 of 2,172,053 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,337 of 2,172,053 )
How can I increase my downloads?