It’s Not Just Counting that Counts: a Reply to Gilbert, Viaña, and Ineichen

Neuroethics 14 (1):23-26 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gilbert et al. argue that discussions of self-related changes in patients undergoing DBS are overblown. They show that there is little evidence that these changes occur frequently and make recommendations for further research. We point out that their framing of the issue, their methodology, and their recommendations do not attend to other important questions about these changes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,479

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The diagrammatic dimension of William Gilbert's De magnete.Laura Georgescu - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 47:18-25.
Acquired Pedophilia and Moral Responsibility.Frederic Gilbert, Andrej Vranic & John Noel M. Viaña - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 7 (4):209-211.
Reply to Karen Michalson: Rand as Guru: Will It Never End?Sky Gilbert - 2004 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 5 (2):479 - 483.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-28

Downloads
16 (#670,470)

6 months
1 (#455,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robyn Bluhm
Michigan State University