The relativity of perceptual knowledge

Synthese 94 (2):145-169 (1993)
Since the most promising path to a solution to the problem of skepticism regarding perceptual knowledge seems to rest on a sharp distinction between perceiving and inferring, I begin by clarifying and defending that distinction. Next, I discuss the chief obstacle to success by this path, the difficulty in making the required distinction between merely logical possibilities that one is mistaken and the real (Austin) or relevant (Dretske) possibilities which would exclude knowledge. I argue that this distinction cannot be drawn in the ways Austin and Dretske suggest without begging the questions at issue. Finally, I sketch and defend a more radical way of identifying relevant possibilities that is inspired by Austin's controversial suggestion of a parallel between saying I know and saying I promise: a claim of knowledge of some particular matter is relative to a context in which questions about the matter have been raised
Keywords Epistemology  Knowledge  Perception  Relativism  Scepticism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF01064336
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,848
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Thought.Gilbert Harman - 1973 - Princeton University Press.
Philosophical Papers.J. L. Austin - 1961 - Oxford University Press.
Sense and Sensibilia.J. L. Austin - 1962 - Oxford University Press.
Seeing And Knowing.Fred Dretske - 1969 - Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Conclusive Reasons.Fred I. Dretske - 1971 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49 (1):1-22.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Perceptual Knowledge.John L. Pollock - 1970 - Philosophical Review 80 (3):287-319.
Perceptual Knowledge Derailed.Jonathan Schaffer - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 112 (1):31-45.
What is Direct Perceptual Knowledge? A Fivefold Confusion.Douglas J. McDermid - 2001 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):1-16.
Dretske on Knowledge Closure.Steven Luper - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (3):379 – 394.
Perceptual Knowledge.Jonathan Dancy (ed.) - 1988 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
97 ( #57,525 of 2,210,527 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #166,029 of 2,210,527 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature