Philosophical Forum 47 (3-4):325-340 (2016)

Authors
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phil.12126
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,393
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On 'the Denial of Bivalence is Absurd'.F. J. Pelletier & R. J. Stainton - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):369 – 382.
Williamson on Bivalence.Miroslava Andjelkovic - 1999 - Acta Analytica 14 (1).
Andjelkovic on Bivalence: A Reply'.Timothy Williamson - 1999 - Acta Analytica 14 (23):35-8.
Bivalence and What is Said.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2007 - Dialectica 61 (1):167–190.
Discussions: Vagueness and Bivalence: A Discussion of Williamson and Simons.B. J. Copeland - 1995 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95 (1):193-200.
Truth, Falsity, and Borderline Cases.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophical Topics 28 (1):211-244.
Excluded Middle and Bivalence.TimothyJ Day - 1992 - Erkenntnis 37 (1):93 - 97.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-09-16

Total views
20 ( #536,964 of 2,449,029 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #442,577 of 2,449,029 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes