Moral responsibility and moral development in Epicurus’ philosophy
In B. Reis & S. Haffmans (eds.), The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics. Cambridge University Press (2006)
Abstract
ABSTRACT: 1. This paper argues that Epicurus had a notion of moral responsibility based on the agent’s causal responsibility, as opposed to the agent’s ability to act or choose otherwise; that Epicurus considered it a necessary condition for praising or blaming an agent for an action, that it was the agent and not something else that brought the action about. Thus, the central question of moral responsibility was whether the agent was the, or a, cause of the action, or whether the agent was forced to act by something else. Actions could be attributed to agents because it is in their actions that the agents, qua moral beings, manifest themselves. 2. As a result, the question of moral development becomes all important. The paper collects and discusses the evidence for Epicurus views on moral development, i.e. (i) on how humans become moral beings and (ii) on how humans can become morally better. It becomes clear that Epicurus envisaged a complex web of hereditary and environmental factors to shape the moral aspect of a human being. 3. In line with Epicurus’ theory of moral responsibility and moral development, Epicurus ethics does not have the function of developing or justifying a moral system that allows for the effective allocation of praise and blame. Rather, for him the function of ethics – and in fact of the whole of philosophy – is to give everyone a chance to morally improve.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Did Epicurus discover the Free-Will Problem?Susanne Bobzien - 2000 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 19:287-337.
Moral Appraisability: Puzzles, Proposals, and Perplexities.Ishtiyaque Haji - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
Stump on libertarianism and the principle of alternative possibilities.Stewart Goetz - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):93-101.
Recent work on free will and moral responsibility.Neil Levy & Michael McKenna - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):96-133.
Moral responsibility—what is all the Fuss about?Kenton Machina - 2007 - Acta Analytica 22 (1):29-47.
Reductionism, rationality and responsibility: A discussion of Tim O'Keefe, epicurus on freedom.Catherine Atherton - 2007 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (2):192-230.
Free will and moral responsibility.John Martin Fischer - 2004 - In David Copp (ed.), Handbook on Ethical Theory. Oxford University Press.
The moral responsibility of the hospital.Richard T. De George - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1):87-100.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-20
Downloads
984 (#7,561)
6 months
38 (#35,144)
2011-01-20
Downloads
984 (#7,561)
6 months
38 (#35,144)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Chrysippus on Retribution and Rehabilitation.Paulo Fernando Tadeu Ferreira - 2013 - Doispontos 10 (2):109-34.