Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45:103-148 (2013)
AbstractABSTRACT: This paper is distinctly odd. It demonstrates what happens when an analytical philosopher and historian of philosophy tries their hand at the topic of reception. For a novice to this genre, it seemed advisable to start small. Rather than researching the reception of an author, book, chapter, section or paragraph, the focus of the paper is on one sentence: Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics 3.5, 1113b7-8. This sentence has markedly shaped scholarly and general opinion alike with regard to Aristotle’s theory of free will. In addition, it has taken on a curious life of its own. Part one of the paper examines the text itself. Part two explores its reception from antiquity to the present day, including present-day popular culture, later ancient, Byzantine, Arabic, Latin Medieval, Renaissance, Victorian and contemporary scholarship. There are some surprises on the way. (The paper also serves as an introduction to the reception of the Nicomachean Ethics from its beginnings to the present.)
Similar books and articles
The Arabic and Islamic Reception of the Nicomachean Ethics.Anna Akasoy - 2013 - In Jon Miller (ed.), The Reception of Aristotle's Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Particularism in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics.Uri D. Leibowitz - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (2):121-147.
The Routledge Guide Book to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics.Gerard J. Hughes - 2013 - Routledge.
Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas on Magnanimity.Tobias Hoffmann - 2008 - In István Pieter Bejczy (ed.), Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, 1200 -1500. Brill.
Bywater's Artistotle's Nicomachean Ethics_- Contributions to the Textual Criticism of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, by Ingram Bywater. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1892. 2 _s_. 6 _d. [REVIEW]H. Richards - 1892 - The Classical Review 6 (07):313-.
Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics.Kenneth A. Telford (ed.) - 1999 - State University of New York Press.
Moral and Intellectual Virtues in the Earliest Latin Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics.Irene Zavattero - 2008 - In István Pieter Bejczy (ed.), Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, 1200 -1500. Brill.
The Nicomachean Ethics is Framed by a Beginning (NEI. 1–3) and an Ending (NE X. 9) Which, in Rather Different Ways, Communicate a Single Message: Politics is the Activity and Branch of Study That Deals with the Subject Matter of the Work. For Us, Ethics and Politics Signify Two Distinct, If Overlapping, Spheres. For Aristotle, There is Just One Sphere–Politics–Conceived in Ethical Terms. This Startling Truth is Generally Downplayed (If Not Totally Ignored) in Many Presenta-Tions of the Nicomachean ... [REVIEW]Malcolm Schofield - 2006 - In Richard Kraut (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Blackwell. pp. 305.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
The Inadvertent Conception and Late Birth of the Free-Will Problem.Susanne Bobzien - 1998 - Phronesis 43 (2):133-175.
Aristotle on the Voluntary.Susan Sauvé Meyer - 2006 - In Richard Kraut (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Blackwell. pp. 137-157.
Aristotle’s Compatibilism in the Nicomachean Ethics.Stephen Everson - 1990 - Ancient Philosophy 10 (1):81-103.
Aristotle and Kierkegaard's Existential Ethics.George J. Stack - 1974 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (1):1-19.