Interpretation: SEG 6 (3):SH25-SH38 (2018)

Abstract
Having access to drill cores and microresistivity scanner images from five shale gas exploration boreholes, we were able to compare the results of structural interpretation based on two data sets. The most frequent structures observed in shale complexes are subvertical strata-bound joints that commonly create calcite veins. We have applied a modified approach for statistical analysis of strata-bound fractures taking into account their height. For comparison of cores and scanner image log structural interpretations, we used the fracture number and fracture intensity parameters. We found significant discrepancies between results of cores and image log interpretations. The much greater number of fractures recognized in the image log than in the core is explained by differences in the observation space related to the core and borehole diameters. To predict which fracture that was visible in the scanner image should be represented in the core, we introduced a “critical angle” parameter and used it in the filtering procedure, which gave satisfactory results. In general, the systematically observed superiority of fracture intensity in the scanner image over the core profile is explained by a large number of tiny noncracked veins that are better recorded by a scanner then are visible by the unaided eye. The most striking difference was found in carbonate-rich formations, in which noncracked veins are more numerous. On the contrary, fracture intensity in intervals enriched in total organic carbon is always higher in core than in the scanner image, due to a resistivity enhancement related to gas presence. We also compared a record of en echelon arrays of open fractures that allow us to discriminate enhanced natural fractures from borehole-induced tensile fractures. A major difference in the bedding fracture density between the core and image log we attribute to core relaxation during its extraction to the surface. A tectonic inversion phase was also possible to recognize based on the integrated core and scanner interpretation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1190/int-2017-0211.1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,388
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

"Drill, Baby, Drill!": The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge And America's Energy Reckoning.Nicholas Monaghan - 2009 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 23 (2):649-672.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-07-26

Total views
11 ( #823,391 of 2,445,547 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,182 of 2,445,547 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes