Sincretism imaginar/Imaginary Syncretism


If we disscuss imaginary syncretism, we will do this by taking some caution measures: we are used to general speculations, to metaphors, but we have to acknowledge that the present article values specific statements, namely, when discussing religion, dogma, the absolute truth, we are actually taking into consideration the individual behind all these. It involves to state the intercultural dialogue (defined as openess toward the other), having as bases several solutions likely to be traced, because when we discuss the great concepts of culture, such in the case of Humanism, we may not be able to grasp their meaning without putting value on the specificities it presupposes. Further more, multiculturalism announces umanism without taking into account that the equivalence between syncretism and the former is the creation of the imaginary in modernity. Multiculturalism being specific to the secular cultures is actally specific to religious cultures rendered secular, where secular can return to religious, yet it is a one-way, the other way round being impossible

Download options


    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,879

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

9 (#958,925)

6 months
1 (#386,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sincretism, Multiculturalism Si Discursul Tolerantei.Van der Veer Peter - 2003 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 2 (5):4-20.
Pragmatic Pluralism and American Democracy.H. G. Callaway - 2000 - In R. Tapp (ed.), Multiculturalism: Humanist Perspectives. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. pp. 221-247.
Imaginary Bodies and Worlds.Kathleen Lennon - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):107 – 122.
Religious Syncretism in India.Anthony J. Parel - 1957 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 32 (2):261-279.
Who is Afraid of Imaginary Objects?Gabriele Contessa - 2009 - In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "On Denoting". Routledge.
Boundary Work: Transcendence and Authoriality in Religious and Secular Law. [REVIEW]David S. Caudill - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):149-161.
The Analytic Imaginary.Marguerite La Caze - 1996 - Cornell University Press.
Is Secularism Neutral?Rex Ahdar - 2013 - Ratio Juris 26 (3):404-429.
Emerging From Imaginary Time.Robert J. Deltete & Reed A. Guy - 1996 - Synthese 108 (2):185 - 203.