Emotion Review 9 (2) (2017)
AbstractA model is proposed to explain how emotional and cognitive processes drive epistemic activities within individual scientists. In this account, emotion–cognition interactions produce cyclical phases of accommodative and assimilative epistemic activities, called thought experiments and empirical experiments, respectively. During thought experiments, scientists ruminate over troubling anomalies in order to generate the theoretical ingredients necessary for constructing new conjectures. During empirical experiments, scientists explore exciting conjectures in order to cover the empirical ground necessary to discover new anomalies. Critically, epistemic activities are accompanied and sustained by positive and negative emotional moods. The main virtue of the model is its specification of a coupled feedback mechanism that explains the dynamics and the temporal dependencies between empirical and theoretical activities underlying scientific discovery.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Review of Thomas S. Kuhn The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. [REVIEW]David Zaret - 1981 - Philosophical Review 90 (1):146.
Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology.F. C. Bartlett - 1933 - Philosophy 8 (31):374-376.
Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology.F. C. Bartlett - 1933 - Mind 42 (167):352-358.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Finite Axiomatizability and Scientific Discovery.Daniel N. Osherson & Scott Weinstein - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:409 - 412.
Scientific Discovery: That-What’s and What-That's.Samuel Schindler - 2015 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 2.
Explaining Scientific Discovery.Aleksandar Jokic - 1991 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
Complexity Versus Complex Systems: A New Approach to Scientific Discovery.F. Tito Arecchi - 1999 - In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian & P. Thagard (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Kluwer/Plenum. pp. 181--196.
Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery.L. Magnani, Nancy Nersessian & Paul Thagard (eds.) - 1999 - Kluwer/Plenum.
Scientific Discovery and Technological Innovation: Ulcers, Dinosaur Extinction, and the Programming Language Java.Paul Thagard & David Croft - 1999 - In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian & P. Thagard (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Kluwer/Plenum. pp. 125--137.
Scientific Discovery on Positive Data Via Belief Revision.Eric Martin & Daniel Osherson - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (5):483-506.
Scientific Discovery and Scientific Reputation: The Reception of Peyton Rous' Discovery of the Chicken Sarcoma Virus. [REVIEW]Eva Becsei-Kilborn - 2008 - Journal of the History of Biology 43 (1):111 - 157.
Representation Reducing Heuristics for Semi-Automated Scientific Discovery.Joseph Perry Phillips - 2000 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
Abduction-Prediction Model of Scientific Inference Reflected in a Prototype System for Model-Based Diagnosis.John R. Josephson - 1998 - Philosophica 61.
The Positivists' Approach to Scientific Discovery.Joke Meheus - 1999 - Philosophica 64.
Scientific Discovery From the Perspective of Hypothesis Acceptance.Eric Martin & Daniel Osherson - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (S3):S331-S341.
An Interrogative-Dialogical Model of the Logic of Discovery.Sang-mo Jung - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Georgia
Scientific Discovery From the Perspective of Hypothesis Acceptance.Eric Martin & Daniel Osherson - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S331-S341.