Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives on Romantic Love

Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Romantic love is a phenomenon of immense interest to the general public as well as to scholars in several disciplines. It is known to be present in almost all human societies and has been studied from a number of perspectives. In this integrative review, we bring together what is known about romantic love using Tinbergen’s “four questions” framework originating from evolutionary biology. Under the first question, related to mechanisms, we show that it is caused by social, psychological mate choice, genetic, neural, and endocrine mechanisms. The mechanisms regulating psychopathology, cognitive biases, and animal models provide further insights into the mechanisms that regulate romantic love. Under the second question, related to development, we show that romantic love exists across the human lifespan in both sexes. We summarize what is known about its development and the internal and external factors that influence it. We consider cross-cultural perspectives and raise the issue of evolutionary mismatch. Under the third question, related to function, we discuss the fitness-relevant benefits and costs of romantic love with reference to mate choice, courtship, sex, and pair-bonding. We outline three possible selective pressures and contend that romantic love is a suite of adaptions and by-products. Under the fourth question, related to phylogeny, we summarize theories of romantic love’s evolutionary history and show that romantic love probably evolved in concert with pair-bonds in our recent ancestors. We describe the mammalian antecedents to romantic love and the contribution of genes and culture to the expression of modern romantic love. We advance four potential scenarios for the evolution of romantic love. We conclude by summarizing what Tinbergen’s four questions tell us, highlighting outstanding questions as avenues of potential future research, and suggesting a novel ethologically informed working definition to accommodate the multi-faceted understanding of romantic love advanced in this review.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Amorality of Romantic Love.Arina Pismenny - 2020 - In Rachel Fedock, Michael Kühler & T. Raja Rosenhagen (eds.), Love, Justice, and Autonomy: Philosophical Perspectives. Routledge. pp. 23-42.
Romantic Love.Thomas H. Smith - 2011 - Essays in Philosophy 12 (1):68-92.
Love: what's sex got to do with it?Natasha McKeever - 2016 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (2):201-218.
Is love an emotion?Arina Pismenny & Jesse Prinz - 2017 - In Christopher Grau & Aaron Smuts (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Love. New York, NY, USA:
Just Friends, Friends and Lovers, or…?Caroline J. Simon - 1993 - Philosophy and Theology 8 (2):113-128.
Romantic Love.Carol Caraway - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):361-368.
Romantic Love.Carol Caraway - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 2 (1):76-96.
Romantic Love: A Philosophical Inquiry.Dwight Van de Vate - 1981 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Romantic Love.Carol Caraway - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):361-368.
On 'Love at First Sight'.Christian Maurer - 2014 - In Christian Maurer, Tony Milligan & Kamila Pacovská (eds.), Love and Its Objects: What Can We Care For? Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 160-174.
Romantic Love and Christianity.Shirley Robin Letwin - 1977 - Philosophy 52 (200):131 - 145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-13

Downloads
18 (#811,325)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations