Journal of Mass Media Ethics 5 (4):233 – 246 (1990)

Abstract
As discussion intensifies, and critics exploit what they see as a serious press abuse of anonymous sources, this article explores current practices and policies, as well as examines justification for and danger of anonymous source usage. Seven guidelines are listed and discussed which may help editors and reporters decide whether to use the anonymous source: editor authorization, just cause, last resort, fullest possible identification, proportionality, just intentions, and second source verification.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1207/s15327728jmme0504_2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,968
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Groping for Ethics in Journalism.H. Eugene Goodwin - 1983 - Iowa State University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Casuistry: A Case-Based Methods for Journalists.David E. Boeyink - 1992 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 7 (2):107 – 120.
An Ethical "Blind Spot": Problems of Anonymous Letters to the Editor.Bill Reader - 2005 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 20 (1):62 – 76.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
122 ( #79,136 of 2,403,329 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,892 of 2,403,329 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes