Han feizi's legalism versus kautilya's arthashastra

Asian Philosophy 15 (2):157 – 172 (2005)
Abstract
Writing only decades apart, Han Feizi (ca. 250 BCE) and Kautilya (ca. 300 BCE) were two great political thinkers who argued for strong leaders, king or emperor, to unify warring states and bring peace, who tried to show how a ruler controls his ministers as well as the populace, defended the need for spies and violence, and developed the key ideas needed to support the bureaucracies of the emerging and unified states of China and India respectively. Whereas both thinkers disliked the new merchants, Han Feizi seems content with a traditional feudal economy, whereas Kautilya wanted to use the state to increase production and the wealth in the king's treasury. Kautilya also had much more extensive discussions of war and diplomacy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09552360500123840
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,813
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The World of Thought in Ancient China.Benjamin I. Schwartz - 1985 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Three Ways of Thought in Ancient China.Arthur Waley - 1939 - Stanford University Press.
The Legalism of Han Fei-Tzu and Its Affinities with Modern Political Thought.Peter R. Moody - 1979 - International Philosophical Quarterly 19 (3):317-330.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
99 ( #53,542 of 2,202,698 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,722 of 2,202,698 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature