Hume’s “projectivism” explained

Synthese 199 (1-2):815-833 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Hume appeals to a mysterious mental process to explain how to world appears to possess features that are not present in sense perceptions, namely causal, moral, and aesthetic properties. He famously writes that the mind spreads itself onto the external world, and that we stain or gild natural objects with our sentiments. Projectivism is founded on these texts but it assumes a reading of Hume’s language as merely metaphorical. This assumption, however, conflicts sharply with the important explanatory role that “spreading” and “staining” are supposed to play, which, ironically, is the very appeal of Hume’s texts to projectivists. In this paper, I first consider the difficulties readers of Hume have encountered in their attempts to ascertain nature of the key psychological process. I then identify in Hume’s texts novel theoretical resources that allow Hume to produce a satisfying answer to the question of process, that is, an account of the precise nature of the key process. I offer this explanation assuming what I take to be Hume’s austere conception of the elements involved in the process: sense impressions and “internal impressions” lacking intrinsic intentionality. On my reading, the spreading process explains the gap between the meager input and the rich, novel output: causal, moral and aesthetic judgments.

Similar books and articles

Projections and Relations.R. M. Sainsbury - 1998 - The Monist 81 (1):133-160.
Hume's Views on Moral Judgment.Clark Gordon Thompson - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Virginia
Further problems with projectivism.Thomas Pölzler - 2016 - South African Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):92-102.
Projectivism and Error in Hume’s Ethics.Jonas Olson - 2011 - Hume Studies 37 (1):19-42.
Hume’s Moral Sentiments As Motives.Rachel Cohon - 2010 - Hume Studies 36 (2):193-213.
Hume on the standard of virtue.Jacqueline Taylor - 2002 - The Journal of Ethics 6 (1):43-62.
The Moral Sentiments in Hume’s Treatise.Åsa Carlson - 2014 - Hume Studies 40 (1):73-94.


Added to PP

353 (#36,690)

6 months
144 (#7,419)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Miren Boehm
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Citations of this work

Fodor’s guide to the Humean mind.Tamás Demeter - 2021 - Synthese 199 (1-2):5355-5375.
Is Shepherd a Bundle Theorist?David Landy - forthcoming - Journal of Scottish Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references